检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:施蕾 罗宇鹏 邓振华[1] Shi Lei;Luo Yupeng;Deng Zhenhua(West China School of Preclinical and Forensic Medicine,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China;West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu,610041,China)
机构地区:[1]四川大学华西基础医学与法医学院,四川成都610041 [2]四川西南司法鉴定中心,四川成都610041
出 处:《证据科学》2018年第3期353-382,共30页Evidence Science
摘 要:足部残疾评定是法医临床实践中下肢残疾评定的难点之一。2017年1月1日《人体损伤致残程度分级》实施,足部残疾划分指标、评定原则与方法与国外标准存在较大差异。本文比较了包括《人体损伤致残程度分级》等国内标准与国外其他伤残标准中足部残疾的相关内容,探讨国内外标准的异同,在比较中为我国标准相关内容的进一步修订和完善提供参考与借鉴。Foot permanent impairment evaluation is considered to be a diffi culty in evaluating the lower limbs permanent impairment in forensic clinical medicine. Guidelines on Grading Permanent Impairment came into force on January 1 st, 2017. The gradings, evaluation principles and evaluation methodology on foot permanent impairment set forth in 2017 Guidelines severely deviate from the foreign countries' criterion. This article compares domestic foot permanent impairment evaluation criterion with the criteria and guides implemented in other countries. Based on an analysis of the similarities and distinctions of the criteria at home and abroad, this article provides reference for further revision and improvement of relevant standards in China. provides reference and inspiration for the revision and improvement of the domestic foot permanent impairment evaluation criteria.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249