检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李栋[1] 王世柱[1] Li Dong;Wang Shizhu
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法学院
出 处:《信访与社会矛盾问题研究》2018年第3期48-57,共10页Research on Public Complaints and Social Contradictions & Problems
摘 要:对于信访制度的理解需要放在当代中国社会治理变迁视域下进行考量。新中国成立之初法理型权威建设因为难以有效嵌入整个社会系统而未能发挥应有的作用,现实的政治运作陷入了卡里斯玛权威,信访在此情境之下作用凸显。改革开放以来法理型权威重新回归,并通过宪法的形式被固定下来,实现了主权的法治化,但是在治权领域,由于复杂的情形,信访成为兜底性制度。当前信访制度改革的一个总体框架是"社会治理",两个具体的制度改革方向是"法治化"和"多元化纠纷解决机制"。The understanding of Letters & Calls System needs to be considered in the perspectives of the changing social governance in modern China. At the beginning of New China, the law-reason-based authority fails to play its role, because it is hard to be effectively embedded in the whole social system. The politics in reality falls into Charisma authority and the Letters & Calls System proves its importance under this situation. Since the reform and opening up, the law-reason-based authority comes back and is fixed in the form of constitution. The legalization of sovereignty is realized. While in the field of governing power, the Letters & Calls System becomes a catch-all system due to the complicated situation. The overall framework of the current letters & calls reform is "social governance" and two specific reform directions are "legalization" & "multiple dispute resolving mechanism".
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222