马克思视角下的文化起源——以艺术起源为切入点  

The Origin of Culture in Karl Marx's Perspective——with the Origin of Art as an Example

作　　者：刘文杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学马克思主义学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《山东理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第4期27-33,共7页Journal of Shandong University of Technology（Social Sciences Edition）

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"马克思主义文化理论发展研究"(11JZD003)

摘　　要：传统的马克思主义强调,文化来源于物质生产劳动,但这实际上并不契合马克思的本意。马克思的本意是人通过对象性活动自我生成,而对象性活动的范围大于物质生产劳动,除物质生产之外,还有自身生命生产和他人生命生产。诚然马克思也说过人通过劳动自我生成,但他这个"劳动"在通过语境来看,还指对象性活动,也就是实践。生成人的对象性活动范围大于物质生产,就为文化来源于实践活动提供了可能性。以艺术起源为切入点,当证实艺术不仅仅起源于物质生产活动,自身生命生产和他人生命生产对艺术的产生也有贡献,这就证明了文化起源于对象性活动,起源于实践。In traditional Marxism doctrine,this statement is often emphasized that culture comes from material productive labor,which,however,does not tell Marx＇s real intention. For Marx,people undergo self-generating through the object activity,and the scope of the object activity is greater than the material production labor. Besides the material production,there are also life production of its own and others. It is true that Marx also said that man created himself through labor,but his ＂labor＂in the context refers to object activity,that is,practice. The range of activities generated by human beings is greater than that of material production,which provides possibility for culture to originate from practical activities. With art as an example,this paper is intended to show that art not only originates from material production activities,it also contributes to the production of art in the life production of one＇s own and other people＇s,which further proves that culture has originated from the object activity,that is,practice.

关 键 词：文化 起源 对象性活动 艺术 

分 类 号：J0-02[艺术—艺术理论]