公平竞争审查制度实施情况的实证研究——以国家发改委公布的59个审查案例为样本  

An Empirical Study on the Implementation of the Fair Competition Review System——Sample of 59 Cases Published by the National Development and Reform Commission

作　　者：朱静洁[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学

出　　处：《竞争政策研究》2018年第4期121-135,共15页Competition Policy Research

基　　金：2017年中国法学会部级课题"移动互联网领域竞争法实施疑难问题研究"[CLS(2017)D107];2017年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目"互联网市场限制竞争行为法律规制研究"(17SFB2039);2017年度重庆市研究生科研创新项目"公平竞争审查标准的实证研究--以各省市的公平竞争审查实施意见为样本"(CYB17084);西南政法大学2017年度地方立法研究项目"地方立法竞争评估的实证研究--以重庆市地方性立法文件为样本"的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：公平竞争审查制度作为规制行政垄断行为的新兴制度,其在全国范围内实施已达22个月,该制度的实施既有清理出部分限制、排除竞争政策措施的良性效果,同时也存在诸多不足,具体包括"自我审查"效果不够理想、咨询机制及第三方评估机制未得到充分适用、审查案例信息公开的规范性和及时性有待提升。通过审查案例的实证考察可以发现公平竞争审查制度实施受制的深层原因,即激励机制缺位、审查流程不健全、互动性不足以及监督机制不完善。公平竞争审查制度在我国的实施要取得显著成果还面临诸多障碍,接下来的障碍克服工作仍然艰巨且意义重大。As a new system of regulating administrative monopoly, the fair competition review system has been implemented nationwide for more than 22 months. The implementation of this system has both the benign effect of removing some restrictions and eliminating the competition policy measures, while there are also many deficiencies, including the lack of satisfactory effect of ＂self-censorship＂, the insufficient application of the consultation mechanism and the third-party evaluation mechanism, and the normative and timely improvement of the disclosure of case information. Through the empirical investigation of the cases, it can be found that the deep reasons for the implementation of the system of fair competition examination are the absence of incentive mechanism, the imperfect review process, the lack of interactivity and the imperfect supervision mechanism. It is still difficult and significant to overcome that obstacle to the implementation of the fair competition review system in our country.

关 键 词：公平竞争审查制度 实证研究 激励机制 互动性 监督机制 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]