检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张博 陈卫华 蒋明洁 ZHANG Bo;CHEN Wei-hua;JIANG Ming-jie(School of Law Master Education,Northwest University of Political Science and Law,Xi'an 710054,China)
机构地区:[1]西北政法大学法律硕士教育学院,陕西西安710054
出 处:《前沿》2018年第3期90-96,共7页Forward Position
基 金:公安部课题"公安理论及软科学研究计划项目"(2012LLYJSXST073)
摘 要:诉前调解作为替代性纠纷解决方式已经越来越多地适用于法院实践。诉前调解的性质趋向、既判力的涵摄对于诉前调解协议的效力具有实质意义。确认诉前调解的既判力的消极作用,可使得法院主导的诉前调解更具司法张力和法律效果,对于化解社会矛盾、实现定纷止争更显活力。Pre-litigation mediation has become more and more applicable to court practice as an alternative dispute resolution method.The nature of the pre-litigation mediation and the implied judgmental power have substantial significance for the effectiveness of the pre-action mediation agreement.Recognizing the negative effect of the prejudice mediation's reconciliation power can make the court-led mediation prior to the appeal gain more judicial tension and legal effects,and it is even more vital for resolving social conflicts and achieving fixed disputes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90