预防和应对被告人翻供的制度构建  

On Establishing the System to Prevent and Cope with the Defendant's Confession Withdrawal

作　　者：王海[1] 杨琳 WANG Hai;YANG Lin(The People＇s Procuratorate of Sichuan Province,Chengdu 610031,china;The People＇s Procuratorate of Jinniu District,Chengdu 610031,china)

机构地区：[1]四川省人民检察院,四川成都610031 [2]四川省成都市金牛区人民法院,四川成都610081

出　　处：《贵州警官职业学院学报》2018年第4期41-50,共10页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College

基　　金：2017年度国家社科基金一般项目(17BFX181);2016年度陕西省教育厅哲学社会科学重点研究项目(16JZ087)

摘　　要：我国刑事诉讼法尽管明确规定"不得强迫任何人证实自己有罪",但这仍然是以被告人具有如实供述义务为前提的,被告人的诉讼地位和权利并没有得到根本性的改变,翻供已成为令司法人员感到十分棘手的难题。为此有必要通过赋予被告人是否作出供述的选择权,改变司法实践中过分依赖被告人口供的现象,促使从"口供中心主义"向"证据裁判主义"转变;扩大辩护律师的程序参与权,保障被告人所享有的辩护权利得到实现;完善我国现有的同步录音录像制度等措施,缓解或彻底解决被告人翻供问题。Although the Criminal Procedure Law of the P.R.C stipulates that ＂no one shall be forced to prove his guilt＂, it is on the premise that the defendant has the obligation to make true confession. As the legal status and rights of the defendant has not got fundamental changes, the defendant＇s confession withdrawal has become a thorny problem for the judicial officers. Therefore, it is necessary to change the excessive reliance on the defendant＇s confession in judicial practice by giving the defendant the right to choose whether to confess, thus promoting the change from ＂confessioncentered principle＂ to ＂principle of evidence-based judgment ＂. It is also necessary to expand the procedural participation of defense lawyers to ensure the implementation of the defendants＇ defense rights, and improve China＇s current system of synchronous recording and video recording to ease or completely solve the problem of defendant＇s confession withdrawal.

关 键 词：被告人翻供 沉默权 辩护权 同步录音录像 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]