从全国一级学科评估审视高水平行业特色型大学学科竞争力  

A Review of the Discipline Competitiveness of High-level Industry-based Characteristic Universities from the Perspective of National First-level Discipline Evaluation

作　　者：谢辉祥 赵志钦[1] 甘国龙 XIE Huixiang;ZHAO Zhiqin;GAN Guolong(University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu 611731;Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074)

机构地区：[1]电子科技大学发展规划与学科建设处,副处长四川成都611731 [2]华中科技大学教育科学研究院,博士研究生湖北武汉430074 [3]电子科技大学发展规划与学科建设处发展规划办公室,主任四川成都611731

出　　处：《中国高教研究》2018年第9期7-13,19,共8页China Higher Education Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金教育学一般项目"行业划转院校发展战略类特色研究"(BFA170055);电子科技大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目"研究型大学与城市科技创新发展互动研究"(ZYGX2016J277)的研究成果

摘　　要：以2002年至今的四轮全国一级学科水平评估结果为源数据,对17所工科类高水平行业特色型大学学科竞争力的实证研究发现:这些大学在与本行业相关的主干学科领域具有领先优势,但部分传统学科面临挑战;优秀学科发展呈进步趋势,但整体学科竞争力不足;可持续性与多样性的学科生态尚未形成。在"双一流"建设背景下,高水平行业特色型大学可以通过实施"倾斜-共生-融合-提升"的学科建设策略,培育更多优势学科,推动学科结构的有序拓展,持续提升学科竞争力。Based on the four rounds of national First-level Discipline Evaluation results from 2002 to the present, an empirical study of the discipline competitiveness of 17 engineering high-level industry-based characteristic universities found that these universities have leading advantages in traditional fields, but some traditional disciplines faced with challenges; excellent disciplines show a progressive trend, but the overall discipline is not competitive; the ecology of sustainability and diversity has not yet taken shape. Under the background of ＂Double first-class＂ Construction, high-level industry-based characteristic universities can develop more disciplines with leading advantages by implementing the lean-symbiosis-integration-improvement discipline construction strategy and promote the orderly expansion of discipline structure, thereby enhancing the competitiveness of the discipline.

关 键 词：高水平行业特色型大学 学科评估 学科竞争力 

分 类 号：G642.3[文化科学—高等教育学]