强制合并仲裁权的理论追问与制度完善  

Theory Questions and Regime Improvement of the Power of Mandatory Consolidated Arbitration

作　　者：牛颖秀 

机构地区：[1]北京大学

出　　处：《北京仲裁》2018年第2期45-62,共18页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly

摘　　要：强制合并仲裁权违反了仲裁的意思自治原则和保密性,但却是查明案件事实、避免矛盾裁决、高效解决纠纷所必需的权力,符合真实、时间和成本三个维度的正义观。因仲裁与司法系统相互独立、仲裁庭具有专属性与非固定性,强制合并仲裁权应定位为仲裁机构的案件管理权,由仲裁机构行使最为恰当。为了防止强制合并仲裁权被滥用,保障当事人必要的平等权利,应当对其施加合理限制：仅适用于必须合一确定的关联案件、当事人享有基于商业秘密的异议权、重新组建合并仲裁庭。The power of Mandatory consolidated arbitration violates the autonomy and confidentiality principle,but it is necessary to find out the facts,to avoid contradictory awards and to resolve the dispute efficiently,so it confirms to the justice in reality,cost and time.Since arbitration and court should be independent,and the arbitration tribunal is exclusive and not-fixed,the power of Mandatory consolidated arbitration should be deemed as the arbitration case management,and exercised by the arbitration institution.To restrict the power,it can only merge the most related cases,and the parties shall have the right of objection based on business secrets,and the arbitration tribunal of merger cases should be assigned again.

关 键 词：强制合并仲裁权 正当性 主体 合理限制 

分 类 号：D915.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]