检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘志荣 彭歆[2] 章文博 Liu Zhirong;Peng Xin;Zhang Wenbo(Stomatology of Shanxi Dayi Hospital,Taiyuan 030032,China)
机构地区:[1]山西大医院口腔科,太原030032 [2]北京大学口腔医院口腔颌面外科
出 处:《中华整形外科杂志》2018年第8期644-647,共4页Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
摘 要:目的 通过对患者问卷调查分析比较应用游离腓骨瓣和股前外侧穿支皮瓣修复单侧上颌骨缺损术后患者生存质量的差异.方法 以2014年3月至2015年6月,北京大学口腔医院收治的单侧上颌骨肿瘤,并采用游离腓骨瓣或股前外侧穿支皮瓣修复肿瘤切除后上颌骨缺损的患者为研究对象.术后1年对2组患者进行临床随访,应用华盛顿大学生存质量量表进行评分.结果 腓骨瓣组20例,得分为(89.37±15.34)分,股前外侧穿支皮瓣组20例,得分为(88.04±15.78)分,两者比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.17,P=0.36).结论 采用游离腓骨瓣和股前外侧穿支皮瓣在改善上颌骨缺损患者术后生存质量方面总体无明显差异.Objective The difference in quality of life between patients with unilateral maxillary defect repaired by free fibular flap and anterior lateral femoral perforator flap was compared with questionnaireanalysis.Methods In March 2014 to June 2015,40 cases of tumor resection caused unilateral maxillary defects were included in this study,which were treated with free fibula flap or femoral anterolateral perforator flap in Peking University Stomatological Hospital.Two groups of patients were followed up one year after surgery,and the University of Washington Quality of Life Scale score was obtained.Results The score of fibular flap group was 89.37± 15.34 and score of anterior lateral femoral perforator flap group was 88.04 ± 15.78 (t =0.17,P =0.36).Conclusions There was no significant difference between free fibular flap and anterior lateral femoral perforator flap in improving postoperative quality of life.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.83.94