疑问词量化歧义的优选分析:在量词提升说的基础上前进  

Optimal analysis of wh-quantification ambiguity: A further step beyond Quantifier Raising

作　　者：邹颖娟[1] 余小强[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学外国语学院,410082

出　　处：《外语与翻译》2018年第3期33-39,98,共7页Foreign Languages and Translation

基　　金：湖南省社科基金项目“OT语义与Wh量化研究”的部分研究成果,项目号:12YBA074

摘　　要：疑问词的量化问题一直是生成语法研究的核心问题之一。早期研究基本沿袭量词提升说的研究思路,计算复杂,不符合经济原则。本文运用优选语义学理论的制约条件排序说分析疑问词量化的歧义问题,结果显示,无论是在计算简易度、解释力度还是在普适性等方面都要强于量词提升说。Wh-quantification has long been a hot topic in Generative Grammar.Complicated and sometimes ad hoc,the basic approach of Quantifier Raising is not economic in coping with the ambiguity of wh-quantification.By Constraints Ranking,Optimality Theoretical Semantics offers a better way in solving this problem as far as calculation,explanation and universality are concerned.

关 键 词：优选语义学 疑问词量化 歧义 制约条件排序 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]