贪污受贿罪量刑新标准的司法适用研究  

Research on the Judicial Application of the New Sentencing Standards of Corruption and Bribery

作　　者：王刚 WANG Gang(School of Law,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212013 China)

机构地区：[1]江苏大学法学院,江苏镇江212013

出　　处：《河北法学》2018年第9期78-90,共13页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：王刚主持的江苏省社科基金青年项目<新司法解释背景下贪污受贿罪量刑规范化实证研究>(17FXC001)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：《刑法修正案(九)》和贪污贿赂犯罪司法解释为贪污受贿罪创设了新的量刑标准,新量刑标准在理解和适用中存在诸多疑难问题,需要从理论上予以剖析和解答。在贪污受贿罪的量刑中,应根据案情确定基本犯罪构成事实,多数情况下犯罪数额和犯罪情节分别是两罪的基本犯罪构成事实,少数情况下这种关系可能发生颠倒。基本犯罪构成事实用以确定起点刑,非基本犯罪构成事实在此基础上增加刑罚量。贪污贿赂犯罪司法解释将犯罪数额和犯罪情节设定为贪污罪和受贿罪的基本犯罪构成事实和非基本犯罪构成事实,情节在数额的基础上发挥升格法定刑的功能,但却丧失了法定的独立量刑标准的地位。司法实践中可以参照关联性犯罪的入刑标准来把握可量化情节的严重程度,不可量化情节的严重性由法官自由裁量。贪污受贿罪量刑新标准有四种法定刑升格模式,法官应当通过对情节严重性和案件整体危害性的综合考量来决定是否升格法定刑。犯罪数额和犯罪情节都可作为基本犯罪构成事实,基本犯罪构成事实达到上一档法定刑处罚标准下限的1/2以上时,辅以一定量的非基本犯罪构成事实,才能升格法定刑。The ninth Amendment of Criminal Law and the judicial interpretation of corruption and bribery setted new sentencing standards for corruption and bribery,there are many difficult issues in understanding and applicating of the new sentencing stardards,they need to be analyzed and answered in theory.In the sentencing of corruption and bribery,the determination of basic constitutive elements of corruption and ribery should be based on the details of a case.In most cases,the amount and circumstances of crime are the basic constitutive elements of corruption and bribery,this relationship may reversal in a few cases.The basic constitutive elements determine the starting point of punishment,the non-basic constitutive elements increase the punishment on this basis.The judicial interpretation defines the amount and circumstances as basic constitutive elements and non-basic constitutive elements of corruption and bribery,the circumstances play the role of make a criminal convicted despite the amount not meeting the standard and upgrade the legal punishment decided by the amount,but they lose the status of independent statutory sentencing standards.In judicial practice,the seriousness of measurable circumstances should reference to the criminal standards of relevance crimes and the seriousness of non-measurable circumstances should be determined by judges.The new sentencing stardards of corruption and bribery has four patterns of punishment upgradation,judges should not apply the provisions automatically,but rather though a comprehensive consideration of the seriousness of circumstances and the overall damage of case to decide whether to upgrade the legal punishment.The amount and circumstances of crimes are all likely to be basic constitutive element,when the basic constitutive element reaches more than half of the standard of upper legal punishment and supplement by a certain amount of non-basic constitutive element,it can upgrade the legal punishment.

关 键 词：贪污受贿罪 量刑标准 犯罪数额 犯罪情节 司法适用 

分 类 号：DF613[政治法律—刑法学]