论我国仲裁地法院制度的完善  

Improvement ofthe Mechanism of Chinese Courts as the Court at the Seat of Arbitration

作　　者：薛源[1] 程雁群 XUE Yuan;CHENG Yanqun(Law School,University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100029,China)

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院,北京100029

出　　处：《法学论坛》2018年第5期86-94,共9页Legal Forum

摘　　要：仲裁地法院对国际商事仲裁司法支持和审查机制,是仲裁地规则竞争的重要组成部分。在我国打造国际仲裁中心的背景下,临时仲裁机制引入,境外仲裁机构内地仲裁日渐增多,我国仲裁地法院制度亟待完善,以增强我国作为仲裁地的竞争力。完善我国仲裁地法院制度主要包括三个方面,确立仲裁地法院对仲裁协议效力的最终决定权,发挥仲裁地法院在临时仲裁中协助仲裁庭组成的作用,以及明确仲裁地法院撤销仲裁裁决的地位。最高人民法院应以仲裁地法院的视角审视我国仲裁法律制度的不足,推动仲裁法律制度的改革,在现有法律框架下,这主要依靠最高人民法院以司法解释等形式使我国仲裁地法院对国际商事仲裁司法支持和审查的机制接近示范法国家来实现。The mechanism of judicial supervision over international commercial arbitration by court at the seat of arbitration is anessential part of the regulatory competition of seat of arbitration. For China to build international arbitration center, with the intro-duction of ad hoc arbitration, growth of arbitration choosing foreign arbitral institution and China's Mainland as seat, it is pressingthat Chinese courts improve their function as court at the seat of arbitration to increase the competitiveness of China's Mainland asa seat of arbitration. Such improvement mainly includes ： establishing the position of final decision concerning the validity of arbi-tration agreements, developing the function of assisting the composition of arbitral tribunal, and clarifying the status of setting a-side arbitral awards. Within the framework of Chinese arbitration law, the improvement is to be realized through judicial interpre-tations issued by Chinese Supreme People＇ s Court which follows Model Law pattern.

关 键 词：仲裁地法院仲裁协议效力 仲裁庭组成 仲裁裁决撤销 

分 类 号：D915.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]