预防与应对被告人翻供之口供规则探析  

Prevention and Response Rules of Confession of the Defendant Confession Withdrawal

作　　者：王海[1] 杨琳 WANG Hai;YANG Lin(The People＇s Procuratorate of Sichuan,Chengdu 610031,China;The People＇s Court of Jinniu,Chengdu 610000,China)

机构地区：[1]四川省人民检察院,四川成都610031 [2]成都市金牛区人民法院,四川成都610000

出　　处：《湖南工程学院学报（社会科学版）》2018年第3期71-77,共7页Journal of Hunan Institute of Engineering(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：2017年度国家社科基金一般项目"审判中心主义视域下被追诉人取证能力强化机制研究"(17BFX181);2016年度陕西省教育厅哲学社会科学重点研究项目"宽严相济视野下的未成年人诉讼制度创新及实践检讨"(16JZ087)

摘　　要：当前,对口供的形成和判断有两项重要的规则,即口供任意性规则和口供印证规则。后者系为防止我国司法人员权力滥用,在总结经验基础上,根据自由心证原则改造而成,但该规则在实务中受到了规避,司法人员在运用时,既不能过分强调和追求口供的印证性,也不能违背逻辑和经验法则。At present, the formation of confession and judgement have two important rules namely, the free and voluntary rule of confession and the corroboration rule of confession. The latter refers to the prevention of abuse of judicial personnel, which is based on summing up experience, and the principle of free intention transformation. But the rules are ignored in the practice. The personnel can never have too much emphasis on the pursuit of testimony confirmation, which also can’t go against the logic and empirical rule.

关 键 词：翻供 口供任意性规则 口供印证规则 自由心证 经验法则 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]