检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱明勇[1] Zhu Mingyong(Criminal Justice Research Center,Zhengzhou Institute of Aeronautical Industry Management,Zhengzhou 450046,China)
机构地区:[1]郑州航空工业管理学院刑事司法研究中心,河南郑州450046
出 处:《黑河学院学报》2018年第9期74-77,共4页Journal of Heihe University
摘 要:1910年颁行的《大清著作权律》并未能使中国的著作权制度迈进"走向权利的时代",偏离了以保护著作者权利为宗旨的著作权法本应蕴含的价值目标。究其根源,实出于以下原因:依旧徘徊于传统社会结构中的清廷,奉行变法的工具主义法律观,以及朝野对设立著作权制度以实现国家富强的宏观愿景,受此影响,法典自身也只能体现出权力控制的价值观,著作权只具有附属性而非立法的本位价值,值得反思。Copyright Law of the Qing Dynasty enacted in 1910 doesn’t make the copyright system in China get into “the age of rights”, because it deviates from the value goal which should be contained in copyright law with the protecting of author’s rights as the aim . The root reasons for that are is that the Qing Dynasty still lingers on the traditional social structure and adheres to instrumental view of law, and that the government still hold the macro-vision of making the nation more prosperity by enacting copyright system. Infuenced by these factors, the code itself can only refect the value of power control, and the copyright only has the attached attribute rather than the standard value of legislation, which is worthy of refection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7