论云间、常州词派对五代、北宋词的接受异同  

Yunjian and Changzhou Ci School's Different Reception of Ci in the Five Dynasties and the Northern Song Dynasty

作　　者：刘晓[1] Liu Xiao

机构地区：[1]武汉大学文学院

出　　处：《常州大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第5期108-116,共9页Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金青年项目"明清之际‘经世’视域中的文学思想演进研究"(12CZW012)

摘　　要：明末清初的云间词派与清代嘉庆年间兴起的常州词派,都推尊五代、北宋词。理论大旗的一致,使两派具有相通的词学主张:皆倡词有寄托,以达"风骚"之旨;有相似的师法对象,重视"花间"温、韦词。然而,两派差异亦非常明显:在取法风格上,云间词派主宗"婉约"词风,常州词派则推重以周邦彦为代表的"浑成"一路;在词论视野上,云间词派不免偏颇狭隘,常州词派则注意兼采众长。两派对五代、北宋词的接受差异,根本上缘于不同的历史背景、立论情境,以及因处在词学发展的不同阶段,从而导致的不同的认知视野。但它们亦前后相承,端绪相接,共同推助词坛风气向"推尊词体"一路发展,隐约勾勒出明清词坛的嬗变轨迹。Yunjian and Changzhou Ci School, active respectively in the late Ming Dynasty and the early Qing Dynasty, and Jiaqing Empire of the Qing Dynasty, both think highly of the Ci in the Five Dynasties and the Northern Song Dynasty. Similar theoretical foundation means similar propositions. They both advocate “coquettish” works, worship similar models, and value Huajian authors such as Wen Tingyun and Wei Zhuang. However, differences also exist between these two schools. Yunjian Ci School prefers the genre of “delicate restraint” while Changzhou Ci School pays more attention to the genre of “refined integration”. In the perspective of Ci critism, Yunjian Ci School has narrower critical views than that of Changzhou Ci School with the latter tending to gather various good qualities. These reception discrepancies are due to their different historical backgrounds, arising contexts and developing phases of Ci-ology which bring about different cognitive perspectives. They are in succession. They both promote Ci to a “respectable” style and, to some degree, reveal the evolution route of the circle of Ci in the Ming and Qing Dynasties.

关 键 词：云间词派 常州词派 五代、北宋词 接受 明清词坛 

分 类 号：I207.2[文学—中国文学]