论傅斯年的明史研究——以“傅斯年档案”为中心的探讨  

On Fu Sinian's Study of Ming History: Discussion on“Fu Sinian Archives”

作　　者：张峰[1] ZHANG Feng(School of History,Northwest University,Xi＇an Shaanxi 710069,China)

机构地区：[1]西北大学历史学院,陕西西安710069

出　　处：《廊坊师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2018年第3期54-58,共5页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：2015年国家社科基金青年项目"中外史学交流视野下的历史语言研究所学术范式与成就探析"(15CZS002)阶段性成果

摘　　要：明史是傅斯年用力较多的一个领域,但是长期以来学术界却很少关注这一问题。实际上,傅氏不仅组织学人校勘《明实录》,而且身体力行参与《明实录》之整理,制定了《校勘叙例》,同时对史语所学人的校勘工作提出审核意见。他曾有编纂《明书三十志》的设想与计划,并因此拟定了各志的篇目和参与撰写的人员名单,但终因现实变故未能施行。这份未能完成的书稿,折射出傅斯年在明史研究领域的学术志向。在"傅斯年档案"中,还有几则傅斯年研究明史的未刊札记,透露出他明史研究的两种倾向:一是对于前人明史研究成果的关注与他的学术兴趣所在,二是对于明代典籍著述旨趣、内容优缺、编纂特点的揭橥与阐释。Ming History is an area where Fu Sinian has exerted more effort, but the academic community has paid little attention to thisissue for a long time. In fact, Fu Sinian not only organized experts and scholars to collate Mingshilu, but also personally participated insorting Mingshilu, compiled Jiaokanxuli, and at the same time put forward examining opinions about the collation work of the scholarsof Institute of History and Language. He once had the idea and plan for compiling Thirty Chronicles of the Ming Dynasty, and thusdrafted a list of the various articles and the llst of people involved in the writing, but it was not implemented due to the actual situation.This unfinished manuscript reflects Fu Sinian＇s academic ambitions in the field of Ming History research. In the ＂Fu Sinian Archives＂,there are also several unpublished notes on Fu Sinian＇s study of Ming History, revealing two trends in his history of Ming Dynasty： oneis the attention to the achievements of the previous Ming Dynasty and his academic interest, and the other is his interpretation of theessential thoughts, advantages and disadvantages, and compilation characteristics of the Ming Dynasty classics.

关 键 词：傅斯年 《明实录》校勘 《明书三十志》 读史札记 20世纪明史研究 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]