检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翁杰 WENG Jie(Northwest University of Political Science and Law, Xi' an, Shanxi 710063)
机构地区:[1]西北政法大学,陕西西安710063
出 处:《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2018年第3期119-124,共6页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
基 金:教育部2014年度人文社会科学研究一般项目<涉外民事法律选择模式研究--基于法律方法论的视角>(14YJA820027)的阶段性成果
摘 要:国际私法教学改革是近些年来国际私法学界面临的重要课题之一。鉴于法律选择理论和方法的多元性以及价值取向的多维性,在国际私法教学中有必要引入多维思维方法。这不仅能够使学生更好地理解各种法律选择理论和方法之间的关系,而且有助于提高学生的实践操作能力。国际私法多维思维能力的培养要求学生在法律选择的观念上由"立法中心主义"向"司法中心主义"转变,充分认识到准据法的确定是一个多维思维的结果,法律选择过程既是"找法"的过程,同时也是"法律选择正当化"的过程,而法律选择正当化应当从形式、实质和程序三个向度上展开。The teaching reform of private international law is one of the important topics faced by the private international law community in recent years. In view of the muti-dimensionality of legal choice theory and method and plurality of value orientation, this paper proposes that it is necessary to introduce muti-dimensional thinking method in the teaching of private international law, which can not only enable students to better understand the relationship between various legal choice theories and methods, but also help them to improve their practical skills. The cultiva- tion of muti-dimensional thinking ability in private international law requires that students change from "legislative centralism" to "judicial centralism" in the concept of legal choice, fully realize that the determination of the applicable law is the result of a muti-dimensional thinking, the process of legal choice is not only the process of "seeking law", but also the process of "justifying legal choice", and the legitimacy of legal choice should be carried out from the three aspects of form, substance "and procedure.
分 类 号:G42[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249