检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张庆垒[1] 施建军[2] 刘春林[2] 汤恩义[3] Zhang Qinglei;Shi Jianjun;Liu Chunlin;Tang Enyi(School of Marketing and Logistics Management,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Nanjing 210093,China;School of Business,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China;School of Software,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China)
机构地区:[1]南京财经大学营销与物流管理学院,江苏南京210093 [2]南京大学商学院管理学院,江苏南京210093 [3]南京大学软件学院,江苏南京210093
出 处:《外国经济与管理》2018年第9期71-83,共13页Foreign Economics & Management
基 金:国际自然科学基金项目(71572075);国家自然科学基金项目(61772260)
摘 要:近年来技术多元化研究一直都是探讨技术多元化与企业绩效关系,忽略了技术多元化对不同类型技术创新能力的影响。本文基于组织学习理论,探索技术多元化对企业双元技术创新能力的不同作用。采用2007—2010年568家中国主板上市公司数据的负二项回归结果表明,企业技术多元化能够有效促进探索式创新和利用式创新能力,并且技术多元化对探索式创新的促进作用要大于对利用式创新的促进作用。我们还发现,行业跟风研发创新的竞争互动是影响技术多元化与双元创新能力关系的重要情境因素。企业所在行业跟风研发创新的竞争互动越频繁,越有利于技术多元化的企业培养利用式创新能力,却不利于对探索式创新能力的培养。实证研究结果表明企业在采用技术多元化战略培养双元创新能力时,既要注重利用多元化的技术知识库来实现双元创新能力之间的平衡,又要考虑跟风研发创新的行业竞争互动造成的影响。Summary: In recent years, the themes of technological diversification have always focused on the relationship between technological diversification and corporate performance, neglecting how technological diversification influences specific types of innovative competences. Under the background of China's past transition economy, many companies' technology innovations show a tendency of following-innovation, such as following-R&D. If companies in the industry tend to do following-R&D, the whole industry will form the following-R&D innovation interactive atmosphere, which may have influence on companies' technology innovation paths and choices. However, this important situational factor is ignored by the literature of technological diversification. Therefore, based on the organizational learning theory, this study tests the relationship between technological diversification and innovative competences, and explores the moderating role of industrial competitive interaction. Through the negative binomial regression analysis, the above hypothesis is confirmed. The contributions of this study are mainly reflected in the following two aspects. On the one hand, it expands the generality of research on the effect of technological diversification on different types of technological innovative competences. Previous studies of the relationship between the two are only to use the data from the source of a single industry. This study adopts the cross-industry data of public listed companies, to develop the generality of the relationship between technological diversification and ambidextrous technological innovative competences. On the other hand, to the discussion of situational factors, previous studies have paid more attention to the internal situational factors of a single industry (biotechnology industry, automobile industry, etc. ), such as technological distances, redundant resources, etc., and lacked the consideration of cross-industry situational factors. This study enriches the context literature resea
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.20.44