论争议性案件中判决书说理方式的突破、挑战与应对  

On the Breakthrough,Challenge and Countermeasure of Reasoning Manner in Judgment in Controversial Cases

作　　者：韦志明[1] WEI Zhi-ming

机构地区：[1]韩山师范学院

出　　处：《北方法学》2018年第5期35-45,共11页Northern Legal Science

摘　　要：与以往的判决书相比，“惠阳83号判决书”在结构性说理、沟通性说理、说理方向、判词用语等方面实现了说理方式的突破。但这些说理方式在运用中也面I临着论证随意性、以情理论证代替法律论证、论证的逻辑性不强等挑战。“惠阳83号判决书”在说理方式上存在的这些问题与法官没有坚持正确的方法论立场有关，故在方法论上的应对办法就是坚持正确的法教义学立场。它要求以法律规范为解决问题的出发点，要以法律规范作为证立的依据。不要轻易脱离“文本文义”进行说理，坚持规范基础分析方法。Compared with the previous judgments, through in the way of reasoning in structural reasoning, ＂Huiyang No. 83 Judgment＂ has achieved a break- communicative reasoning, reasoning direction, and judgment terms. However, the application of these reasoning methods are confronted with the challenges of demonstrating randomness, replacing legal argumentation with rational argumentation, and lacking demon- strating logic. These problems in reasoning the Judgment are related to the judge＇s failure to adhere to the correct methodological position. Therefore, the methodological nal standpoint. It requires taking legal norms as the starting norms as the basis of evidence, so as not to dissociate from normative basic analysis methods. response is to stick to the correct legal doctri- point of solving problems, and taking legal the meaning of the text easily and insist on

关 键 词：争议性案件 判决书说理 惠阳83号判决书 

分 类 号：DF0[政治法律—法学理论]