4种教学方法对医学统计学教学效果影响的网状Meta分析  

The Influence of Four Different Teaching Methods in Medical Statistics: a Network Meta-Analysis

作　　者：景方圆 李迎君 丁烨[1] 高启胜[1] 范春红[1] JING Fangyuan;LI Yingjun;DING Ye;GAO Qisheng;FAN Chunhong(Hangzhou Medical College,Hangzhou 310053,China)

机构地区：[1]杭州医学院,浙江杭州310053

出　　处：《浙江医学教育》2018年第5期4-7,29,共5页Zhejiang Medical Education

基　　金：浙江医学高等专科学校教育教学研究项目(编号:XJJG201501)

摘　　要：目的:采用网状Meta分析评价4种不同教学方法对医学统计学教学效果的影响。方法:计算机检索中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库中有关不同教学方法对医学统计学教学效果影响的研究,末次检索时间为2018年4月。按照纳入标准进行文章的选择,运用Ge MTC14. 3和Stata 13. 0软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入文章19篇,网状Meta分析结果显示:案例教学法、以问题为基础教学法、翻转课堂教学法对比传统的讲授教学法,在影响医学统计学教学效果方面差异具有统计学意义(P <0. 05);根据累积排序概率曲线下面积排序结果,案例教学法是提高医学统计学教学效果的较优方法。结论:基于网状Meta分析结果和累积排序概率图下面积排序结果,案例教学法对提高医学统计学教学效果优于其他。[Objective] To explore the influence of four different teaching methods in Medical Statistics. [Method] A systematic search of CNKI,Wan-fang database and VIP database w as carried out. The research on the influence of different teaching methods on medical statistics is included. GeM TC14. 3 and Stata 13 softw are w ere used for M eta-analysis. [Result] Totally 19 studies w ere included. The netw ork meta-analysis show ed that CBL teaching method,PBL teaching method and SPOCS teaching method w ere more effective than traditional teaching method（ P〈0. 05）,CBL teaching method w as more effective than other teaching method. [Conclusion] Based on the results of netw ork meta-analysis and rank,CBL w as superior to other teaching methods in M edical Statistics.

关 键 词：教学方法 医学统计学 网状Meta 

分 类 号：G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学]