检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]美国马萨诸塞州萨福克大学(波士顿)战略与国际商务系 [2]美国马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校 [3]不详
出 处:《国际社会科学杂志(中文版)》2018年第3期52-66,共15页International Social Science Journal(Chinese Edition)
摘 要:在大多数发展中国家,贿赂无处不在。关于腐败对经济增长、外来投资等宏观变量的负面影响,人们已经作了广泛研究。在本项研究中,我们采用一种微观视角,考察贿赂对个人情绪产生的后果。我们对印度两组为获得政府服务而贿赂或未贿赂的个人的事后自我报告作了分析,以探讨他们的认知反应和情感反应。我们对其中所透露出的基本情绪以及他们面对贿赂情境时的行动理由作了甄别。我们发现,情感反应似乎在那些行贿的人的报告中占主导地位,而认知反应则在那些未行贿的人的报告中占主导地位。了解个人对腐败的情绪反应,可以为研究腐败的各种道德方面提供新的途径,我们从中得出了对进一步深入研究和实践的启示。Bribery is ubiquitous in most developing countries. The negative impact of corruption on macro variables such as economic growth and foreign investments has been widely studied. In this study, we take a micro perspective to examine the effects of bribery on the individual's emotions. We analysed two sets of post-event self-reports of individuals who bribed or did not bribe for government services in India to explore their cognitive and affective response. We identified the basic emotions revealed along with the justifications provided for their action when faced with a bribe situation. We find that affective response appears to dominate the reports of those who bribed, while cognitive response dominates those who did not bribe. Understanding individual emotional responses to corruption provides new avenues for researching the moral aspects of corruption and we derive implications for further research and practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40