检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周明朗[1] Zhou Minglang
出 处:《语言战略研究》2018年第5期11-20,共10页Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning
摘 要:本文回顾、梳理了中国语言教育政策的演变过程,认为影响这个演变的两大主要因素是全球化和民族国家建设。全球化直接导致了中国的政治地理格局,造成了中国不同地区语言教育政策的分分合合,至今仍未取得理想的和谐与统一。百年来,中国的民族国家建设经历了4个不同的模式。每个民族国家建设模式都有自己的语言意识形态,并以其意识形态为基础形成语言立法,制定语言教育政策,以建设有效的语言秩序。但是万变不离其宗,清朝政府1911年通过的《国语统一办法案》仍是各届政府语言教育政策参照的蓝本。由于时代背景的限制,这个蓝本不能充分满足当代中国语言教育的需要。当代语言教育政策面临多重挑战:一要满足民族国家建设的需要;二要兼顾社区的语言多元现实;三要让国民有愉悦的语言学习过程,使他们成为忠诚的和合格的公民;四要培养国民的全球竞争能力。This article reviews and analyzes file evolution of language education policies in Greater China in file last one hun- dred years. It points out that globalization and nation-state building are the two most important factors that have affected this evolution. Globalization broke imperial China into separate lands, leading to diversity in language education policies and unfulfilled wishes for file unification of these policies. In the past century, Greater China experienced four models of nation-state building. Every model had its own language ideology, and, language education policies on file basis of this ideology, developed a corresponding language order. More or less, these language education policies followed file Qing dynasty's 1911 Act of the Unification of the National Language. However, with changing political landscape, the Qing's plan cannot answer today's language education challenges. Now language education policies must meet the needs of nation-state building, take into account the linguistic diversity in various communities, make language learning a pleasant experience for every student so that they become loyal and qualified citizens, and prepare citizens for global competition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28