检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鞠晓伟[1] 袁香楠 张晓芝 Ju Xiaowei;Yuan Xiangnan;Zhang Xiaozhi(School of Management,Jilin University,Changchun 130022)
机构地区:[1]吉林大学管理学院,长春130022
出 处:《图书情报工作》2018年第20期112-121,共10页Library and Information Service
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目"要素禀赋;市场分割对区域制造业企业技术选择的抑制效应与适应机制研究"(项目编号:71303091);吉林省教育厅社会科学项目"东北老工业基地区域高校知识转移能力对企业知识转移绩效作用机制研究"(项目编号:JJKH20180527SK)研究成果之一
摘 要:[目的 /意义]对现有相关研究文献进行梳理分析,探索性地提出知识转移双方关系应该由工作、利益和友情3个维度构成,并创造性地将3种关系纳入到同一理论框架内进行研究。[方法 /过程]通过对304份国内高校企业之间的合作数据进行实证分析,检验工作、利益与友情3个关系维度与知识转移绩效的作用关系。[结果/结论]结果发现:①友情关系维度对知识转移绩效产生负向影响;②友情关系对利益关系与知识转移绩效之间的关系有负向的调节作用;③紧密的工作关系与利益关系对知识转移绩效产生正向影响。最后,讨论实证研究的理论贡献与实践意义,并给出论文研究的局限性。[Purpose/significance] This article reviewed the relevant literatures and put forward that ties between source and recipient consist of working relationship, interest relationship and affective relationship. This paper creatively integrates these three dimensions into same scope to study.[Method/process] Based on 304 samples of university-industry collaboration in China, the paper empirically validated the impact of working relationship, interest relationship and affective relationship on the performance of knowledge transfer.[Result/conclusion] The results show that:the close friendship tie plays a negative effect on the performance of knowledge transfer; and the close friendship tie adjusts negatively the relationship between interest tie and performance of knowledge transfer; and the close working tie and interest tie have positive effect on performance of knowledge transfer. Finally, the paper discussed the theoretical contributions and managerial contribution of this empirical study, and put forward the research limitations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117