检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘宏刚 薛英威[1] LIU Honggang;XUE Yingwei(Ward One of Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,Harbin Medical University Affiliated Oncology Hospital,Harbin 150081,China)
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院胃肠外科一病房,哈尔滨150081
出 处:《医学综述》2018年第19期3923-3927,共5页Medical Recapitulate
摘 要:目的探讨淋巴结转移度(LNR)对胃癌患者术后生存期的评估价值。方法回顾性分析2007年1月至2009年12月哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院收治的366例胃癌患者的临床病理资料和5年预后结果,分析LNR对患者术后5年生存期的评估价值。结果 Cox多因素分析显示,年龄、T分期、N分期、LNR是影响胃癌5年预后的危险因素(P<0.05)。Kaplan-Meier分析曲线显示,N分期、LNR均可将患者区分,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在淋巴结分期中,活检淋巴结总数增大后出现"分期漂移"。结论 LNR和N分期同样具有评估胃癌预后的能力,传统N分期由于"分期漂移"和其使用的限制条件等问题,有理由考虑使用LNR作为传统N分期的一种补充,尤其是对于早期胃癌等活检淋巴结数量淋巴结少的患者。Objective To discuss the value of gastric cancer lymph node metastatic ratio(LNR) evaluation for postoperative survival of patients with gastric cancers. Methods Retrospective analysis on the clinic-pathological materials and the 5 years prognosis data of 366 gastric cancer patients from Harbin Medical University Affiliated Oncology Hospital during Jan. 2007 and Dec. 2009 was done, and the predictive value of LNR on 5-year survival was analyzed. Results Cox analysis showed that age, T stage, N stage, LNR are the independent hazard factors (P 〈 0.05 ). The Keplan-Meier indicated that the ration stage and LNR could differentiate the patients with statistically significant difference ( P 〈 0.05 ). In N staging, there was a " stage drift" after the total number of biopsy lymph nodes increased. Conclusion LNR and N stage can both be used to predict the prognosis of the gastric cancer patients, however, the method of N stage has the restriction of " stage drift" and usage limitations,it's reasonable to consider using LNR as a complement to the traditional N staging, especically for the patients with less lymph nodes in the early stage biopsy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7