中共党史学范式的转换及其理论意义——以胡绳为个案  

Paradigm Transformation of the Study of the History of CPC and Its Theoretical Significance:Taking Hu Sheng as an Example

作　　者：汪兵 WANG Bing1,2(1. College of Marxism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241003, China; 2. College of Economics and Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230013, China)

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学马克思主义学院,安徽芜湖241003 [2]安徽农业大学经济技术学院,合肥230013

出　　处：《合肥工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2018年第5期36-41,共6页Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：安徽省教育厅省级研究项目(2015jyxm708)

摘　　要：科恩的范式概念在学术研究中产生了极其深远的影响。就历史学研究而言,史学范式所体现出来的价值既表现在历史编撰和历史学研究方面,也体现于历史观念的变迁。在党史学范式研究方面,胡绳运用革命史范式和现代化范式的视角解读了中国近代史以及中共党史的进程;同时也阐释了这两种史学范式之间的关系。研究胡绳党史学范式的理论意义,不仅推进了党史研究的深入发展,也拓展了对于党史学范式转换的深刻认知。Kuhn＇s concept of paradigm study of his has had a profound impact on academic r tory is concerned, the value embodied in the paradigm of history is n of history and the study of history, but also in the change of histo paradigm of the study of the history of the Communist Party of China revolutionary history paradigm and the modernization paradigm to the esearch. As far as ot only reflected in rical ideas. As for （CPC）, Hu Sheng applied interpretation of the proces the the the the s of modern C historicalcal signif hinese history and the history of the CPC, and described the paradigms. Exploring Hu Sheng＇s paradigm of the study of the relationship between the two history of CPC which can not only promote the further development of the study is of theoreti the history of CPC, but also extend the profound cognition of the paradigm transformation of the study of the history of CPC.

关 键 词：中共党史研究 革命史范式 现代化范式 范式转换 

分 类 号：D23[政治法律—政治学]