检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵静[1] 严保平[1] ZHAO Jing;YAN Baoping(The Sixth Peoples Hospital of Hebei Province,Baoding 071000,China)
机构地区:[1]河北省第六人民医院
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2018年第10期1598-1600,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的:探讨高中生独生子女与非独生子女父母教养方式及成就动机的差异。方法:采用父母养育方式评价量表(EMBU)、成就动机量表(AMS)对624名高中生进行调查。结果:独生子女的父亲采取情感温暖理解、偏爱被试的教养方式多于非独生子女的父亲(t=2.30、7.34,P〈0.05);独生子女的母亲采取过干涉过保护、偏爱被试的教养方式多于非独生子女的母亲(t=2.06,7.35;P〈0.05);独生子女避免失败因子得分低于非独生子女(t=-2.04,P=0.042);Logistic回归分析显示,独生子女较非独生子女缺少避免失败的成就动机。结论 :非独生子女的高中生较少得到父母的偏爱,更能用积极的心态处理失败带来的不良情绪。Objective:To research the difference between parenting style and achievement motivation for highschool only children and non-only children.Methods:We investigated 624 high-school students by EMBU and AMS.Results:Fathers of only children had mroe emotional warmth and favoritism than those of non-only children(t=2.30,7.34;P〈0.05);Mothers of only children always showed more excessive intervention,protection and favoritism than those of non-only children(t=2.06,7.35;P〈0.05);Only children got lower score in failure avoid factor than Non-only Children(t=-2.04,P〈0.05);Logistic regression analysis showed that:Only children had lower failure avoid achievement motivation than non-only children.Conclusion:High school students who are not the only children are less likely to get parental preference,but will be more able to cope with failures with positive attitude.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.231.72