高中生独生与非独生子女父母教养方式、成就动机的差异  被引量:4

A Contrastive Analysis of Parenting Style and Achievement Motivation for High-school Only Children and Non-only Children

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:赵静[1] 严保平[1] ZHAO Jing;YAN Baoping(The Sixth Peoples Hospital of Hebei Province,Baoding 071000,China)

机构地区:[1]河北省第六人民医院

出  处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2018年第10期1598-1600,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology

摘  要:目的:探讨高中生独生子女与非独生子女父母教养方式及成就动机的差异。方法:采用父母养育方式评价量表(EMBU)、成就动机量表(AMS)对624名高中生进行调查。结果:独生子女的父亲采取情感温暖理解、偏爱被试的教养方式多于非独生子女的父亲(t=2.30、7.34,P〈0.05);独生子女的母亲采取过干涉过保护、偏爱被试的教养方式多于非独生子女的母亲(t=2.06,7.35;P〈0.05);独生子女避免失败因子得分低于非独生子女(t=-2.04,P=0.042);Logistic回归分析显示,独生子女较非独生子女缺少避免失败的成就动机。结论 :非独生子女的高中生较少得到父母的偏爱,更能用积极的心态处理失败带来的不良情绪。Objective:To research the difference between parenting style and achievement motivation for highschool only children and non-only children.Methods:We investigated 624 high-school students by EMBU and AMS.Results:Fathers of only children had mroe emotional warmth and favoritism than those of non-only children(t=2.30,7.34;P〈0.05);Mothers of only children always showed more excessive intervention,protection and favoritism than those of non-only children(t=2.06,7.35;P〈0.05);Only children got lower score in failure avoid factor than Non-only Children(t=-2.04,P〈0.05);Logistic regression analysis showed that:Only children had lower failure avoid achievement motivation than non-only children.Conclusion:High school students who are not the only children are less likely to get parental preference,but will be more able to cope with failures with positive attitude.

关 键 词:高中生 独生子女 非独生子女 父母教养方式 

分 类 号:R395.9[哲学宗教—心理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象