检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马玉香 MA Yu-xiang(Department of Radiology,Dingtao District People's Hospital,Heze,Shandong Province,274100 China)
机构地区:[1]菏泽市定陶区人民医院放射科,山东菏泽274100
出 处:《中外医疗》2018年第28期184-185,188,共3页China & Foreign Medical Treatment
摘 要:目的比较研究螺旋CT与钼靶X线摄片在乳腺癌筛查中的应用价值。方法方便选择该院在2016年8月—2018年4月期间收治的52例乳腺癌患者作为研究对象,术前,均接受螺旋CT与钼靶X线摄片检查,并以手术病理诊断为金标准,比较两种诊断方式的检查结果。结果螺旋CT检出41例,检出率78.84%,钼靶X线摄片检出34例,检出率65.38%,数据分析,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=4.504,P=0.033)。螺旋CT检出25例(48.07%)钙化,34例(87.17%)腋窝淋巴结转移,钼靶X线摄片检出40例(76.92%)钙化,27例(69.23%)腋窝淋巴结转移,组间比较,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=17.755,9.439,P=0.000,0.002)。结论螺旋CT与钼靶X线摄片各有特点,相比而言,螺旋CT筛查乳腺癌,检出率更高。Objective To compare the application value of spiral CT and mammography in breast cancer screening. Methods A total of 52 patients with breast cancer admitted to the hospital from August 2016 to April 2018 were convenient enrolled. All patients underwent spiral CT and mammography, and were diagnosed with surgical pathology as standard, compare the results of the two diagnostic methods. Results First, 41 eases were detected by spiral CT, the detection rate was 78.84%, and 34 eases were detected by mammography. The detection rate was 65.38%. The data were analyzed and the difference was statistically significant (X^2=4.504, P=0.033). Second, spiral CT detected 25 eases (48.07%) of calcification, 34 eases (87.17%) of axillary lymph node metastasis, 40 eases (76.92%) of calcification detected by mammography, and 27 eases (69.23%) of axillaxT lymph node metastasis differences between groups were significant and statistically significant (X^2= 17.755, 9.439, P=0.000, 0.002). Conclusion Spiral CT and mammography have their own characteristics. In contrast, spiral CT screening for breast cancer has a higher detection rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7