完善检察机关自行补充侦查制度的思考  

On Self-Supplementary Investigation System of Procuratorate

作　　者：王小光[1] 米卿 Wang Xiaoguang;Mi Qing(Procedural Law Research Center,East China University of Political Science and law,Shanghai 20004;Public Prosecution Department,People＇s Procuratorate of Zhoushan,Zhejiang,Zhoushan Zhejiang 316200)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学诉讼法研究中心,上海200042 [2]浙江省舟山市人民检察院公诉二部,浙江舟山316200

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2018年第6期132-140,共9页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：2017年最高人民检察院检察理论研究资助课题"完善检察机关自行补充侦查制度的路径"的阶段性研究成果(项目编号:GJ2017C35)

摘　　要：检察机关的自行补充侦查制度长期受到外部侦查体制和内部业务分工模式的制约,其制度功能和价值均未完全实现制度设计之初的目标。自行补充侦查作为检察机关侦查权体系的一个重要内容,其制度完善直接关系到检察机关侦查权的设置模式及存在形式,也是检察机关法律监督等职能实现的重要凭借。进一步发掘自行补充侦查的制度功能,有必要在立法上明确其侦查范畴的属性,通过对自行补充侦查范围进行相对清晰的界定,并在监察体制改革和检察机关内设机构改革过程中,继续整合检察机关现有的侦查力量和资源,加大对犯罪嫌疑人的各项诉讼权利的保护力度,探索建立较为高效的自行补充侦查制度。The supplementary investigation system has been restricted by the external investigation system and internal division of labor leading to the outcome that the value of this specific system was not realized totally.Supplementary investigation, as a part of the investigation system, can affect the structure and form of investigation system directly. In order to dig out the function and value of supplementary investigation system, itis necessary to define the nature of this system clearly, set up a comparatively clear scale for supplementary investigation system, assign the investigation staff and resources rationally in the process of supervision reform and prosecution reform, enhance the protection of criminals＇ rights, and build a more efficient supplementary investigation system.

关 键 词：监察体制改革 自行补充侦查 侦查资源 律师介入 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]