检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹星宇 CAO Xingyu(Jilin University, Changehun 130012, China)
机构地区:[1]吉林大学,吉林长春130012
出 处:《环境与可持续发展》2018年第5期71-73,共3页Environment and Sustainable Development
摘 要:本文分析我国环境侵权案件中因果关系认定不确定的原因以及暴露出来的问题,就解决我国环境侵权因果关系不确定问题提出建议,旨在对环境侵权因果关系认定理论以及立法的发展提供借鉴和参考。研究指出,环境侵权因果关系不确定的原因:一是立法关于因果关系认定的证明标准不够明确;二是科学认识不足造成因果关系的不确定。环境侵权因果关系不确定情况下的问题主要包括污染者是否存在赔偿责任和污染者承担的责任应该是多少。为此本研究就解决环境侵权因果关系不确定情况提出以下建议:一是将因果关系具体化;二是建立统一的证据审查机制。This paper analyzes the reasons for the uncertainty of the causal relationship between the environmental tort cases in China and the problems exposed, and puts forward some suggestions on solving the uncertainty of the causation of environmental tort in our country,aiming at making certain contributions to the theory of the cognizance of the causation of environmental tort and the development of the legislation. The paper points out that the reasons for the uncertainty of the causal relationship of environmental tort are as follows: One is that the standard of proof of causation is not clear enough Second,lack of scientific understanding leads to the uncertainty of causality. The main questions under the uncertain causal relationship of environmental tort include whether or not the polluter is liable and how much the polluter should be liable. Therefore,this paper proposes the following suggestions on solving the uncertainty of the causal relationship of environmental tort. One is to externalize causality. The second is to establish a unified evidence review mechanism.
分 类 号:X21[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195