宫颈环形切除术、冷刀锥切术对高级别子宫颈上皮内瘤变临床疗效对比  

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Cervical Loop Resection and Cold Knife Conization for Advanced Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

作　　者：蔡冬梅 CAI Dong-Mei(Jiangsu Haian people＇s Hospital,obstetrics and Gynecology,Nantong,Jiangsu 22660)

机构地区：[1]江苏省海安县人民医院妇产科,江苏南通226600

出　　处：《智慧健康》2018年第25期78-79,共2页Smart Healthcare

摘　　要：目的对比宫颈环形切除术、冷刀锥切术对高级别子宫颈上皮内瘤变临床疗效。方法将60例患者分为观察组与对照组,每组各30例,观察组患者应用宫颈环形切除术进行治疗,对照组患者应用冷刀锥切术进行治疗,对比两组患者的临床疗效。结果观察组患者与对照组相比,手术时间相对比较短、术中出血量相对比较少、术后并发症发生率相对比较低,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论使用宫颈换切除术治疗高级别子宫颈上皮内瘤变时,其手术时间相对比较短,术中出血量相对比较少,且术后并发症发生率较低,具有良好的治疗效果,值得在临床中推广和应用。Objective To compare the clinical effects of cervical circular excision and cold knife conization on advanced cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Methods 60 patients were divided into observation group and control group, 30 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with cervical circular excision, and the control group was treated with cold knife conization. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group had shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding and lower postoperative complications, and the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Cervical replacement surgery for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, the operation time is relatively short, the amount of bleeding during the operation is relatively small, and the incidence of postoperative complications is low, has a good therapeutic effect, worthy of promotion and application in clinical.

关 键 词：宫颈环形切除术 冷刀锥切术 高级别子宫颈上皮内瘤变 

分 类 号：R737.33[医药卫生—肿瘤]