检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张晓玥[1] ZHANG Xiao-yue(College of Humanities,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023,China)
出 处:《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》2018年第6期1-8,共8页Journal of Ningbo University:Liberal Arts Edition
基 金:国家社科基金项目"中国文学地理研究(1950-1970年代)"(18BZW132)
摘 要:20世纪50-60年代,曾发生一场声势浩大的新诗发展道路的讨论。在阶级性、革命性为主导意识的文化环境中,这次讨论的重点限定在诗歌形式方面。为了完成对新诗的"改造",民歌和古典诗被指定为新诗的"学习"对象。由于民歌与古典诗在存在状态与方式上的差异,"学习"过程中被不同程度地强调和运用着,因此对新诗的实际影响并不一样。也由于"学习"对象本身的规定性及其之间的差异性,一部分诗人、诗评家意外获得了一些属于诗本身的并不开阔的话语空间。The period from 1950s to 1960s witnesses a momentous discussion on the development of new poetry. The discussion was only limited to the form of poetry because of the class and revolution oriented environment. In order to accomplish the transformation of new poetry, folk songs and classical poetry are designated as learning objects for new poetry. Because of the differences in the state and the way of existence between folk songs and classical poems, they are emphasized and used to varying degrees in the process of learning, so their actual influences on new poetry are different. In this discussion, some poets and critics expressed their thoughts in a limited space.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38