检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周利芬[1] 陈方红[1] 程雪[1] 冯娅琴[1] 谢丽丹[1] Zhou Lifen;Chen Fanghong;Cheng Xue;Feng Yaqin;Xie Lidan(B Ultrasound Room,Lishui Central Hospital,Lishui,Zhejiang 323000,China)
机构地区:[1]丽水市中心医院B超室,浙江省丽水323000
出 处:《中国基层医药》2018年第19期2504-2507,共4页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
基 金:浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2016KYA201)
摘 要:目的 比较超声、钼靶、磁共振联合与单一检查对乳腺癌的诊断价值.方法 选择2017年1月至2018年2月丽水市中心医院收治的疑似乳腺癌患者100例作为研究对象,所有患者通过超声、钼靶和磁共振三种方式进行检查诊断,以术后病理验证结果为标准,分析三种方式对乳腺癌诊断的准确情况.结果 三种方式联合检测对乳腺癌患者的检出准确率最高(91.00%),显著高于超声(63.00%)、钼靶(72.00%)和MRI(72.00%)单一方式,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=22.364、20.154、16.032,均P〈0.05).结论 超声、钼靶以及MRI在乳腺癌鉴别和诊断的过程中都有着各自的优点,要是进行联合使用就能够显著提升检出率.Objective To compare the diagnostic value of ultrasound,molybdenum target,magnetic resonance(MRI)and single examination for breast cancer.Methods From January 2017 to February 2018,100 patients with suspected breast cancer in Lishui Central Hospital were selected in the study.All patients were detected by ultrasound,mammography and MRI three ways for diagnosis.The results were verified with postoperative pathologic results as the standard.The diagnosis accuracy of three ways for breast cancer were analyzed.Results The detection accuracy of three ways joint detection in patients with breast cancer was the highest(91.00%),which was significantly higher than that of ultrasound(63.00%),mammography(72.00%)and MRI(72.00%)in single mode,the differences were statistically significant(χ2 =22.364,20.154,16.032,all P〈0.05).Conclusion Ultrasonography,molybdenum target X ray and MRI have their respective advantages in the process of breast cancer differentiation and diagnosis,and the detection rate can be significantly improved if combined use.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31