检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:锁威 刘贵刚[1] 齐忠志[1] SUO Wei;LIU Gui-gang;QI Zhong-zhi(Jinlin cancer hospital,Changchun 130000,China.)
出 处:《中国处方药》2018年第11期10-11,共2页Journal of China Prescription Drug
摘 要:目的探究两种常见固定技术对胸腹部肿瘤放射治疗的应用效果。方法选择2015年1月~2017年12月收治的68例行放射治疗的胸腹部肿瘤患者的临床资料,随机分为对照组(胸腹膜真空袋体位固定术)和治疗组(热塑体膜固定技术),每组34例,对比两组的治疗效果。结果对比两组体位固定效果,治疗组明显优于对照组,其对比结果差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论热塑体膜固定技术能够有效减少放疗中的摆位误差和体位移动,可以有效提升放疗精准度。Objective To investigate the effect of two common fixation techniques on the radiotherapy of thoracic and abdominal tumors. Methods According to the clinical data of our hospital in January 2015 ~2017 year in December from 68 consecutive patients who underwent radiotherapy for thoracic and abdominal tumor patients, were randomly divided into control group (pleuroperitoneal vacuum bag fixation) and treatment group (thermoplastic membrane technology, each of the 34 fixed), compared two groups of treatment. Results Compared two groups of position fixation effect, the treatment group was significantly better than the control group, and the difference of the results was statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Thermoplastic membrane immobilization technology can effectively reduce the setup error and posture shift in radiotherapy, and it can effectively improve the accuracy of radiotherapy, and it should be widely used in clinical practice.
关 键 词:胸腹部肿瘤 放射治疗 胸腹膜真空袋体位固定术 热塑体膜固定技术 临床观察
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3