检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何海波[1] HE Haibo(School of Law,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084
出 处:《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》2018年第5期1-8,共8页Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics:Social Sciences edition Edition
摘 要:随着《行政诉讼法》的修改,行政诉讼法研究进入了它的3.0时代。行政诉讼法研究面对不同层次的课题:来自行政诉讼实践的众多法律适用问题亟需解释和澄清,一些基本制度有待长期、深入的理论研究进一步完善,行政诉讼的实践图景有待实证研究予以揭示。行政诉讼法研究也应更加注重方法:案例研究、原理阐释和比较法研究应当更加专业,综合的、跨学科的理论研究大有可为,实证研究中的定量研究将成趋势。行政诉讼研究多元化的同时,也呼唤研究的规范化。With the amendment of the Administrative Litigation Law( ALL) in 2014,research on the ALL has entered its 3. 0 era. Scholars are facing subjects of different levels: Many issues arising from the amended law need tobe interpreted and clarified; some fundamental institutions to be improved through long-term in-depth study; the dynamic pictures of legal practice to be described through empirical research. Scholars need more awareness on the research methodologies: Case study,principle elaborations and comparative law study,which are familiar to most legal scholars,should be more professional; comprehensive,cross-disciplinary study will be on rise; empirical study( especially quantative analysis based on the publicized judicial data) will be widely used.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185