论被执行人实体权利救济的路径选择  

The Choice of Substantial Interest Remedy of the Person Subjected to Execution

作　　者：庄诗岳 ZHUANG Shi-yue(Law School,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872 China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《河北法学》2018年第10期181-192,共12页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目<中国强制执行法体系研究>(12JJD820012)

摘　　要：不当执行侵害被执行人实体权益的情形客观存在,但现有的执行救济路径却不能有效应对被执行人的实体异议。通过执行行为异议处理实体性争议有违审执分离的基本原理,运用再审等程序回应权益判定程序基准时后的事由不符合纠错程序的处理条件,被执行人另行提起民事诉讼则不具有排除执行依据执行力的机能。而债务人异议之诉的目的就在于排除执行权源具有的执行力,通过诉的方式解决实体性争议,能够赋予当事人以正当程序保障,且符合"审执分离"、"执行救济二分论"的程序法理。我国应在债务人不适格异议之诉的基础上建立起债务人异议之诉制度,以构建起完整的实体执行救济体系。The situation of improper execution aggression upon the person subjected to execution＇ s rights objective existence,but the existing execution remedy system unable to cope with the person subjected to execution＇s demur. Through execution behavior objection deal with substantive disputes against the judgment-and-execution apartment principle. Through civil retrial procedure respond to reasons which present after the reference time of the rights and interests judgement procedure does not meet treatment conditions of error-correcting procedure. A later prosecution which sue by the person subjected to execution does not possess the function of removing the execution of the effective legal documents. But lawsuit against the execution by debtor aims at removing the execution of the effective legal documents,and through sue deal with substantive disputes shall ensure that the parties are provided with safeguards of due process. What＇s more,it＇s accord with the judgment-and-execution apartment principle. Our country should set up the system of lawsuit against the execution by debtor,which can build up an integrated execution remedy system.

关 键 词：执行救济 执行异议 再审之诉 另行起诉 债务人异议之诉 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]