检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李哲[1] Li Zhe(School of Arts and Law,Nanyang Institute of Technology,Nanyang City,Henan Province,47300)
出 处:《黄河科技大学学报》2018年第6期112-117,共6页Journal of Huanghe S&T University
摘 要:刑事案件认罪认罚从宽制度是近年来我国司法改革的重大举措之一,迎合了司法实践中对于效率价值的要求。目前相关规定中重视效率、重视对于被追诉人权益的保护,但是对被害人权益的保护却存在一定的不足,集中表现在被害人对程序的适用无决定权和"从宽"标准模糊两个方面。我们应当在认罪认罚从宽制度中赋予被害人有效的程序参与权,完善被害人的量刑参与权,细化从宽标准,并完善相应的救济机制。The system of leniency for guilty plea and accepting punishment in criminal cases is one of the great measures adopted in the judicial reform in China in recent years, which meets the requirement of efficiency value in judicial practice. Currently, relevant regulation emphasizes the efficiency and protection of the accused person , s rights,yet for the protection of the aggrieved person,there exists certain deficiency,which may be focused on the two aspects-the aggrieved person hasnt the right of decision concerning the application of the program, and the standard of “punishing leniently” is rather vague. In the system of leniency for guilty plea and accepting punishment, we should give the aggrieved person the right to effectively participate the program, complete the participation right of the grieved person in sentencing, make detailed standard of “punishing leniently”,and complete relevant mechanism for relief.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.32.116