试释卡西尔论神话与科技的辩证关系  

On Cassirer's Interpretation of Dialectical Genesis from Myth to Science and Technology

作　　者：郭宾[1] GUO Bin(Academy of Music,Shanxi University,Taiyuan 030006,China)

机构地区：[1]山西大学音乐学院,山西太原030006

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2018年第6期1-8,共8页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部青年基金项目"文化与正义:现代性危机视野中的卡西尔文化哲学研究"(13YJCZH045)

摘　　要：卡西尔认为,认识论的失误让黑格尔到尼采的本体论提示了一种终将消除道德、断裂历史、让艺术的合法性依附于科技的封闭真理观,且其中混杂了神话思维糟粕。他通过检验科技符号从神话思维中的辩证发生,证明了生命存在既隐又显、不都在思维里,认为黑格尔、尼采本体论的基础命题,存在都在思维中,或说存在可在思维里显现完自己,并不成立。卡西尔由此实现了真理概念从科技朝向艺术、历史等人文学科的转变与开放,且恢复了道德的合法性。因而,卡西尔扩大的认识论有警示性理解海德格尔存在论的作用。Cassirer insisted that it was the misrecognitions of epistemology that made the ontology from Hegel to Nietzsche＇ s reframe a view of truth in which the abolishment of morality,the breakage of history and the legitimacy of art relying on science and technology were suggested and the dross of mythological thoughts was mixed. With the in- terpretation of dialectical genesis from myth to science and technology Cassirer approved that all the cultural forms must veil where they want to reveal, and refused the proposition of Hegel and Nietzsche＇ s ontology that the name and the essence were dialectally identical. Given Cassirer＇ s view of truth in which art, history and morality from science and technology is restored, Cassirer＇ s enlarged the independent legitimacy of epistemology may play a role in cautionary understanding of Heidegger.

关 键 词：表现 表象 辩证 生命原则 

分 类 号：B084[哲学宗教—哲学理论]