我国民事再审案件受理费制度再思考  

Reconsideration of the Case fee of Civil Retrial

作　　者：熊英灼[1] 尹伟中[1] XIONG Ying-zhuo;YING Wei-zhong(Investigation Department,Hunan Police Academy,Changsha,Hunan,410138)

机构地区：[1]湖南警察学院,湖南长沙410138

出　　处：《湖南警察学院学报》2018年第4期66-70,共5页Journal of Hunan Police Academy

基　　金：湖南省教育厅2014年科学研究优秀青年项目"民事再审制度实证研究"(14B056)

摘　　要：现行《诉讼费用交纳办法》中关于再审案件诉讼费用制度的规定,存在收费范围的规定过于狭窄、费用负担规则的确立僵化等问题,加之司法实践中有关再审案件受理费的承担方式各行其道,使得有关再审案件受理费的法律条文及制度设计已经无法与我国目前民事再审程序运行现状相匹配。为保证民事再审真正发挥其应有功能,在准确定位再审之诉及合理落实司法有偿原则的基础上,应当按照再审事由的区别及程序类型的不同,对收费范围进行了重新划分,并确立以败诉方负担为主兼顾考虑过错因素的再审案件诉讼费用负担规则,使当事人再审诉权得以理性主张、当事人无理缠诉得以尽量减少。There are some problems in the present ＂the regulation on case fee payment＂ concerning the system of litigation fees for retrial cases, such as the narrow scope of fees, the rigid rules of fee burden, and the different ways of beating the fees for retrial cases in judicial practice, which makes the legal provisions and system design of the fees for retrial cases unable to match the current situation of civil retrial procedure in China. in order to ensure that the civil retrial can truly play its due functions. On the basis of accurately locating the retrial litigation and rationally implementing the principle of judicial compensation, the scope of legal fee collection is re-divided according to the differences of retrial reasons and procedural types; and the burden rule of litigation expenses in retrial cases should be established that the losing party or the wrongdoer will bear the case fee finally, to enable litigants＇ retrial fight of action can be rational claimed and unreasonable entanglement of litigants can be minimized.

关 键 词：民事再审 权利(力)配置 诉讼费用 再审之诉 收费范围 

分 类 号：D915.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]