检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王坤远 杨紫荆 于文轩[1] 刘莉[1] 陈征 郭亚兵[1] Wang Kunyuan;Yang Zijing;Yu Wenxuan;Liu Li;Chen Zheng;Guo Yabing(State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis Research,Department of Infectious Diseases,Nanfang Hospital,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China(Wang KE Yu WX,Liu L,Guo YB;Department of Biostatistics,School of Public Health,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China(Yang ZJ,Chen Z)
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学南方医院感染内科器官衰竭防治国家重点实验室,广东省病毒性肝炎研究重点实验室,广州510515 [2]南方医科大学公共卫生学院生物统计学系,广州510515
出 处:《中华肝脏病杂志》2018年第11期829-834,共6页Chinese Journal of Hepatology
摘 要:目的分析多学科协作组(MDT)诊疗中关键因素对肝癌MDT患者预后的影响。方法将2015年1月1日至2015年12月31日进行MDT诊疗的132例HBsAg阳性的肝癌患者纳入回顾性研究,获取其随访数据(至2017年12月31日)。按巴塞罗那分期、MDT意见依从性及是否多学科联合治疗等变量进行分组,对生存期(OS)及肿瘤至进展时间(TTP)进行统计分析。结果依从MDT意见组的生存情况优于非依从组,二者生存曲线差异有统计学意义(χ^2=4.062,P〈0.05),前者的1、2年生存率为72.0%、60.9%,后者为64.3%、40.3%。联合治疗组的生存情况优于非联合治疗组,二者生存曲线差异有统计学意义(χ^2=9.502,P〈0.05),且是生存期的独立影响因素(HR=0.451,95%可信区间为0.210-0.968),前者的1、2年生存率为82.2%、75.4%,后者为63.1%、44.6%。依从且联合组的中位生存期为29.4个月,未依从且未联合组为17.0个月,差异有统计学意义(χ^2=13.336,P〈0.001)。联合治疗组的中位肿瘤至进展时间为15.7个月,非联合治疗组为10.1个月,差异有统计学意义(χ^2=7.263,P〈0.05)。结论提高MDT意见依从性及实施多学科联合治疗可能有助于改善肝癌MDT患者预后。Objective To analyze the prognostic factors on multidisciplinary team patients for diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods This retrospective study enrolled 132 HBsAg positive patients with HCC. MDT diagnostic approach was conducted at our hospital between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2015, and all patients were followed up to 31 December 2017. Groups were arranged according to variables such as Barcelona stage, MDT compliance, and multidisciplinary combination therapy. TTP and OS were statistically analyzed. Results The survival of the MDT compliance group was better than the non-compliance group. The difference in survival curves was statistically significant (χ^2 = 4.062,P 〈 0.05). The 1- and 2-year survival rates of the former group were 72.0%, 60.9%, and the latter was 64.3%, 40.3%. The survival of the combined treatment group was better than the non-combination group. The survival curves of the two groups were statistically significant (χ^2 = 9.502, P 〈 0.05), and they were independent influencing factors of survival (HR = 0.451, 95% CI, 0.210-0.968). The 1- and 2-year survival rates of the former group were 82.2% and 75.4%, and the latter was 63.1% and 44.6%. The median survival time of the follow-up group was 29.4 months, and the non-compliance and the uncombined group were 17.0 months. The difference was statisticaUy significant (χ^2 = 13.336, P 〈 0.001). The median tumor progression time was 15.7 months in the combination group and 10.1 months in the non-compliance group (χ^ 2 = 7.263, P 〈 0.05). Conclusion An advanced MDT compliance with implementation of multidisciplinary combination therapy may help to improve the prognosis of MDT patients with liver cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68