《孟子》对虞舜孝行的书写与“忠”“孝”一体的理论构设  

Mencius' Narration of Shun's Filial Piety and the Construction of the Integrative Theory of Loyalty and Filial Piety

作　　者：梁奇[1] LIANG Qi(College of Liberal Arts,Shanghai University,Shanghai 250100)

机构地区：[1]上海大学文学院

出　　处：《中国人民大学学报》2018年第6期145-151,共7页Journal of Renmin University of China

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目"<诗经>与礼制研究"(16ZDA172)

摘　　要：在早期典籍中,舜为乐官、贤臣和圣君。孟子着力宣扬舜的孝道与孝迹,突出其"父子有亲"的人伦道德规范,从而将舜塑造成"孝""贤""圣"三者兼具的典型形象。孟子之所以选择舜,是因为他既是天子,又有孝行见载于先前文献,具有典型的代表性。但是,当"孝"和"忠"产生冲突而不得不取舍时,孟子和孔子、曾子等先哲一样,主张取"孝"舍"忠"。孟子凸现舜的孝行孝迹,倡导崇孝与治国密不可分,解决了个体家庭形成后"孝"与"忠""家"与"国"之间的矛盾,从而使"孝"与"忠"相契合,以构设"忠""孝"合一的理论体系。Shun was depicted as a music officer, prominent statesman and sage ruler in ancient Chi- nese codes and records. Meneius strongly advocated Shun＇s family filial piety and individual deeds, highlighting a typical image that incorporated obedience, prominence and sanetity. The reason why Mencius singled Shun out is that on the one hand Shun was the son of the god Shang Di, and on the other hand, Shun＇s family filial pieties, which had been reported in ancient codes and records, were highly typical. However, when family filial pieties and loyalty were in conflict, Mencius, Confucius and other wise sages all advocated people to choose family filial pieties over loyalty. From Meneius＇s perspective, advocating family filial pieties and governing a country are closely related, which re- solved the conflicts between family filial pieties and loyalty, as well as conflicts between an individual＇s family and the big country. In this way, a theoretical system was eonstrueted, in which family filial pieties and filial devotional administration were integrated.

关 键 词：《孟子》 虞舜 孝道 孝治 忠孝合一 学理构设 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]