检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周虹[1] 蔡文杰[2] 林燕芳[1] 林志强[1] 何晓梦 Zhou Hong;Cai Wenjie;Lin Yanfang;Lin Zhiqiang;He Xiaomeng(Department of Pharmacy,Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University,Quanzhou 362000,Fujian,China;Department of Radiation Oncology,Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University;Department of Pharmacy,The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University)
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属泉州第一医院药剂科,福建泉州362000 [2]福建医科大学附属泉州第一医院放疗科 [3]大连医科大学附属第一医院
出 处:《药物流行病学杂志》2018年第11期725-728,共4页Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
基 金:泉州市卫计委卫生科研课题(编号:泉卫计办[2016]33号);泉州市第一医院青年科研课题(编号:2014-QN-17)
摘 要:目的:对比奥沙利铂联合替吉奥(SOX)与奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨(XELOX)两种化疗方案在胃癌D2根治术后辅助化疗中的有效性和安全性。方法:采用回顾性队列研究方法,对2011~2013年在我院采用SOX或XELOX方案行辅助化疗的胃癌D2根治术患者,随访观察总生存率(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)和药品不良反应。结果:共43例胃癌D2根治术患者进行辅助化疗,SOX组23例,XELOX组20例,中位随访时间为59个月。SOX组和XELOX组5年总生存率分别为39. 1%和51. 5%,中位DFS分别为46. 5个月和41. 67个月,两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。3~4度不良反应总发生率SOX组和XELOX组分别为26. 09%和20. 0%,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05),主要表现为中性粒细胞减少和恶心呕吐。结论:胃癌D2根治术后辅助化疗中的SOX疗效和安全性未优于XELOX。Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin plus S-1( SOX) versus oxaliplatin puls capecitabine( XELOX) as adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 dissection for gastric cancer. Methods: Between 2011 and2013,patients in our hospital who underwent D2 dissection for gastric cancer were retrospectively reviewed and followed-up to analyze the overall survival,disease free survival and safety of SOX and XELOX. Results:43 patients were enrolled into this study according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. 23 received the SOX regimen and 20 received XELOX therapy. At the median follow-up of 59 months,the 5-year OS rates(39. 1% vs. 51. 5%,P 〉 0. 05) and diseasefree survival(46. 5 months vs. 41. 67 months,P 〉 0. 05) no differed significantly between two groups. The rates of grade3-4 adverse events were 26. 09% and 20. 0%,respectively,for SOX and XELOX group( P 〉 0. 05). Neutropenia,nausea/vomiting and anorexia were the major treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion:Adjuvant SOX therapy appears not to be associated with superior efficacy than XELOX after D2 dissection for gastric cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249