认罪认罚从宽制度中律师参与机制的反思与构建——以审前程序为重点的分析  

Reflection and Reconstruction of Criminal Lawyers’ Participation in Chinese Guilty Penalty System——Analysis Focused on Pretrial Procedure

作　　者：余想钊 Yu Xiangzhao(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院

出　　处：《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》2018年第5期132-139,共8页Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：2018年中南财经政法大学研究生科研创新项目:“司法改革背景下的检察权性质、定位及转型研究”(项目编号:201810611)

摘　　要：律师参与机制是认罪认罚从宽制度中的重要内容。随着试点的展开,学界对于认罪认罚从宽制度中律师参与问题的研究方法,应当逐步从理性建构主义转变为关注经验事实的经验主义。我国当前的认罪认罚从宽制度中的律师在制度层面处于边缘化的定位,在实践层面处于见证人化的角色,这种定位和角色可能带来影响被告人认罪认罚的自愿性和理智性、认罪认罚中检察权力过大、影响刑事律师体制的生态发展和队伍建设等问题。在底限正义视角下,我国可以通过进一步完善值班律师制度、建立律师与检察机关的事前沟通机制、完善律师与被告人的沟通机制、完善被告人反悔的回转程序四个方面来改进律师参与机制,以解决＂当务之急＂。The lawyers＇ participation is one of the essential factors in the Guilty Penalty System. Since the reformation is being generalized,the methodology in research should be transformed from constructionism to experientialism. Up to now,in the Chinese Guilty Penalty system,lawyers＇ positions are marginalized in both rules and experience,which may result the impact of voluntary or sensibility of defendants,the expansion of procuratorial power,or the harm to relevant lawyer system. Under the minimal justice,we can deal with the urgent issue by these four ways： improving the Duty lawyer system,building the prior communication rules,promoting the communication between defendants and lawyers,and improving the regret procedure.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽 控辩协商 律师参与 值班律师 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]