侵权法视角下混合过错同与有过失的概念辨析  

Conceptual Analysis of Mixed Fault and Contributory Negligence from the Perspective of Tort Law

作　　者：李仁真[1] 廖博宇 LI Ren-zhen;LIAO Bo-yu

机构地区：[1]武汉大学中国边界与海洋研究院、法学院 [2]武汉大学国际问题研究院

出　　处：《北方法学》2018年第6期35-43,共9页Northern Legal Science

摘　　要：《侵权责任法》第26条被众多学者及实务工作者解读为关于“混合过错”的规定。而根据我国司法判决，“被侵害人对损害的发生也有过错”这一情形，既包括双方相互侵权，也包含被害人与有过失。由此可以看出，与有过失这一概念在我国民法理论中并没有被独立出来，而是与双方相互侵权行为一起被混同在混合过错这一模糊的概念中，而正是这种模糊对实务工作中的概念辨析产生了一定的影响。通过学理分析并结合司法判决，将混合过错界定为双方相互侵权行为，从而使与有过失同混合过错在概念上彼此独立，厘清混合过错同与有过失的界限，以此为我国的司法实践提供有益的参考。Article 26 of Tort Liability sion on mixed fault. The reality that the Law is interpreted by many scholars and practitioners as a provi- infringed person is also at fault in the occurrence of the damage contains two implications according to Chinese jurisprudence, mutual infringement between the two sides and contributory negligence. It can be seen that the concept of contributory negligence is not independent in our civil law theory but mixed with the mutual mixed fault, which make negative influence on infringement between the identification of different two sides in the vague concept of concept in judicial practice. This paper defines the mixed fault as mutual infringement between the two sides through the approach of theoreti- cal analysis combined with jurisprudence, which can make mixed fault and contributory negligence inde- pendent from each other thus provide a useful reference for the judicial practice in our country.

关 键 词：混合过错 与有过失 侵权责任 《侵权责任法》第26条 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]