三阶层犯罪体系司法适用之路径分析——以“于欢故意伤害案”为范例  

On the Applicable Paths of the Three-level System of Constitution of Crime——Taking “Yu Huan Intentional Injury Case” as an Example

作　　者：赵威[1] 王译 ZHAO Wei;WANG Yi(School of Law,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031,China;School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)

机构地区：[1]南昌大学法学院,江西南昌330031 [2]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《政法学刊》2018年第4期38-47,共10页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：2017年国家社会科学基金一般项目(17BFX053);2017年最高人民检察院检察理论研究重点项目(GJ2017B11);国家"2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心资助项目(教技函2013[26])

摘　　要："三阶层犯罪构成说"源于日本刑法理论,数年来学界争议不断,而司法实践中亦未明辨其理论之优益所在。若于法律适用中予以肯认,三阶层之内涵正与事实脉络同序,符合人类通常认知结构,亦与刑法规范的一般逻辑(即从客观到主观、从行为到行为人)高度吻合。尽管"三阶层犯罪构成说"尚未形成司法之主流,但若在疑难案件中则具备传统"四方面要件说"无可比拟之精确效果,此意味着"三阶层犯罪构成说"不仅在理论上具有前瞻性,更具备司法实践之现实意义。且以"于欢故意伤害案"为突破口分析三阶层犯罪构成体系在司法实践中的适用路径,可明确三阶层理论司法适用之优越性。The three-level system of constitution of crime has been a controversial issue for many years since it was introduced from Japan to China decades ago. If it is confirmed in legal application, the connotation of three-level system of constitution of crime is in accordance with the facts and fits for the usual cognition of human beings and for the general logics of criminal law regulations（from objective to subjective and from action to actor）. Although the theory of threelevel system of constitution of crime hasn’t become the trend of justice, it has achieved more precise results in solving the tough cases compared with traditional notion of ＂ four prerequisites of a case＂, which means that is has made a step forward in theory and has practical significance in judicial practice. This paper takes ＂Yu Huan Intentional Injury Case＂ as an example to analyze the applicable paths of three-level system of constitution of crime and its advantages in judicial practice.

关 键 词：三阶层 司法适用 普通案件 疑难案件 优越性 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]