日本起诉状一本主义与预断防范  

Indictment-only Doctrine and Prejudge Prevention in Japan

作　　者：董林涛[1] Dong Lin-tao(School of Law,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,China)

机构地区：[1]深圳大学法学院,广东深圳518060

出　　处：《政法学刊》2018年第5期70-78,共9页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：中国法学会部级法学研究课题"以审判为中心与司法职权关系研究"[CLS(2017)D132]

摘　　要：法官预断排除是现代刑事诉讼的基本原则。为革除"一件记录提出主义"惯行下法官预断横生、庭审流于形式的弊病,日本以第三次诉讼模式转型为契机,确立起诉状一本主义。在该制度下,起诉状承载两项基本功能:一为通过明示诉因以确定审判对象;二为预防法官庭前预断。两者缺一不可,构成了起诉状一本主义的"一体两面"。从效果上看,起诉状一本主义有效排除了法官庭前预断,为审判中心主义奠定了基础。在当前司法改革背景下,对日本起诉状一本主义制度的基本内容进行梳理,对于我国公诉提起方式的改革具有重要参考价值。Judge＇s prejudging exclusion is the basic principle of modern criminal procedure.In order to eliminate the disadvantages of the judges＇ prejudice and formalized trial cased by conveyance of all dossiers,Japan has established the indictment-only doctrine under the background of the third litigation model transformation.The bill of complaint carries two basic functions：one is to determine the object of the trial by explicating cause of action;the other is to prevent the judge prejudgment.Both functions are indispensable.From the effect point of view,the indictment-only doctrine effectively rules out the pre-trial judgment of the judge and lays the foundation for trial-centrism.In the context of the current judicial reform,combing the basic content of the Japanese prosecution-one system has important value for the reform of the way of public prosecution in China.

关 键 词：起诉状一本主义 裁判公正 审判对象 诉因 预断排除 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]