检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:付翠[1] Fu Cui(Department of Investigation,Guangdong Police College,Guangzhou 510232,China)
出 处:《政法学刊》2018年第5期111-117,共7页Journal of Political Science and Law
摘 要:在以"审判为中心"的司法改革背景下,强大的侦查体系也相应发生变革,而侦查讯问作为侦查中的重要环节,必须围绕"审判为中心"来获取口供等证据材料,并接受讯问监督,以防止非法讯问。在比较和分析中、日、韩三国讯问监督机制现状的基础上,我国现行侦查讯问监督机制存在主体唯一、检警同流、保障缺乏、力度不强等局限性,未来要进一步加强监督理念,增设监督主体,从立法层面去弊固利,进一步完善我国的侦查讯问监督机制。Under the background of judicial reform with "trial as the center",the powerful investigation system has also undergone corresponding changes,and the investigation and interrogation is an important phase in the process of investigation.Evidence materials such as confessions must be obtained and supervised around trial to prevent illegal interrogation.On the basis of comparison and analysis of the current surveillance mechanism and interrogation in China,Japan and Korea,this paper points out that there is only one subject in the current surveillance mechanism of investigation and interrogation in Japan and Korea.This paper points out that there are some limitations in the current investigation and interrogation supervision mechanism in China,such as the only subject,the same flow of procurators and police,the lack of guarantee and the lack of strength,etc.In the future,China shall further strengthen the concept of supervision,add the subject of supervision,consolidate the advantages and get rid of the disadvantages from the legislative level,and further improve the supervisory mechanism of investigation and interrogation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4