检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]英国曼彻斯特大学艺术,历史与文化学院 [2]英国学术院 [3]南京大学文学院
出 处:《马克思主义美学研究》2008年第2期16-22,共7页Research on Marxist Aesthetics
摘 要:本文分析和批驳了把悲观看做一种文化批判形式的现代悲剧观的错误和自我矛盾。文化批判的悲剧观作为一种精英主义的悲剧观,将作为高雅文化的悲剧与日常生活的平庸无奇对立起来,以绝对精神贬低世俗经验,在其本体论意义与精英化倾向、自由与决定论、虚无主义与常胜主义等问题上一再陷入僵局。事实上,崇高的、非凡的与日常的、平庸的是一种辩证的关系,两者之间存在着富于革命性的连续性。在希望的问题上,情况也是如此。悲剧带给人们的是希望,而不是乐观主义,两者的区别在于希望是与失败的经验紧密结合在一起的。There are several ways in which the modern idea of tragedy is self-contradictory as a form of Kulturkritik.Being an elitist theory,this idea of tragedy makes a high-minded contrast between tragic intensity and everyday banality and often falls into a dilemma when it tries to explain how tragedies manifest both an ontological condition and an elitist tendency,both freedom and determinism, and both nihilism and triumphalism.In fact,there is a dialectic relationship and revolutionary continuity between the sublime and the commonplace.The same is true for hope.At its finest,tragedy instructs us how to hope without optimism. What tragedy brings to people is not optimism,but a hope that cannot be possible without the experience of failure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145