论仲裁第三人  

A Study of the Third Party in Arbitration

作　　者：宋连斌[1] 杨玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学国际法研究所

出　　处：《仲裁研究》2005年第3期17-27,共11页Arbitration Study

摘　　要：社会纠纷的复杂性导致多方当事人争议在仲裁实践中遭遇尴尬。仲裁协议相对性的现实障碍,催生了学者们对“仲裁第三人”制度的设想。作者首先澄清了理论界某些对“仲裁第三人”认识上的误区,总结并深刻评析了正反两个方面的观点,结合对国外立法和仲裁规则的解读,实证地分析了最高人民法院公布的典型案例,在此基础上进一步分析了仲裁制度的优越性并得出结论:仲裁中不宜设立第三人制度。The complicate disputes result in the bewilderment of multiple parties in the practice of arbitration. Therefore some scholars assume a system of 'the third party in arbitration' for the relativity of arbitration agreement. The author first clarifies some theoretic misapprehensions about 'the third party in arbitration',then analyses pros and cons in depth by examining some typical cases of the Supreme People's Court and international arbitration rules and regulations,finally the author explores advantages of the system of arbitration and draws an conclusion that 'the third party in arbitration' should not be established.

关 键 词：第三人 仲裁第三人 仲裁价值 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]