我国涉外商事仲裁错误裁决司法审查救济制度之缺陷及其重构  

Problems and Resolutions:the Chinese Legal Regimes on Judicial Reviewing and Redressing of Erroneous Foreign-Related Commercial Arbitral Awards

作　　者：石现明[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南财经大学

出　　处：《仲裁研究》2010年第2期70-81,共12页Arbitration Study

基　　金：云南财经大学2008年科学研究项目"国际商事仲裁的公正价值及其实现机制研究"的阶段性成果

摘　　要：我国《民事诉讼法》和《仲裁法》规定的涉外商事仲裁错误裁决司法审查救济制度包括不予执行制度和裁决撤销制度。对于涉外商事仲裁裁决不予执行制度,两法的规定前后不一致,在实践中常常导致司法不统一,而且有关仲裁裁决被裁定不予执行的法律后果之规定与国际通行做法不一致。对于涉外商事仲裁裁决撤销制度,则存在有关得撤销仲裁裁决的理由的规定不科学不合理,申请撤销仲裁裁决的期限过长等缺陷。文章主张应当取消不予执行制度,并从完善撤销仲裁裁决的理由、明确司法审查与当事人意思自治的关系、完善撤销仲裁裁决的程序等方面来完善涉外商事仲裁裁决撤销制度。The legal regimes on judicial reviewing and redressing of erroneous foreign-related commercial arbitral awards stipulated in the Civil Procedure Law and the Arbitration Law in our country include the regime of non-enforcement and the regime of setting aside arbitral awards.As to the regime of non-enforcement of foreign-related commercial arbitral awards,the stipulations in the two laws are not in conformity,often leading to non-unification in judicial practice,and the legal subsequence of non-enforcement is not in conformity with the international practices.As to the regime of setting aside foreign-related commercial arbitral awards,there exist such defects as that the stipulations on the grounds to set aside arbitral awards are neither scientific nor reasonable,the period limitation allowed to apply to set aside an arbitral award is too long.The thesis suggests that the regime of non-enforcement should be abolished and the regime of setting aside foreign-related commercial arbitral awards should be improved by such ways as rationalizing the grounds to set aside arbitral awards,clarifying the relations between judicial review and the autonomy of the parties, perfecting the procedures to set aside arbitral awards.

关 键 词：涉外商事仲裁 司法审查救济制度 不予执行 撤销裁决 缺陷与重构 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]