检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王吉春[1] WANG Ji-chun(School of Humanity and Law, Shenyang Institute of Engineering, Shenyang 110136, China)
出 处:《青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第3期95-99,共5页Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:沈阳工程学院校级课题(RWBS-1502)
摘 要:著作权的刑法保护是我国刑法分则当中的重要组成部分。在著作权刑法保护方面的立法意旨、入罪的数额、入罪的行为方式、主观方面、刑罚设置问题、刑罚转换问题、邻接权的问题以及行政权与司法权的衔接问题等方面,中国内地与香港都存在着差异。所以,通过与香港著作权刑法保护的比较,可以完善我国著作权刑法保护的不足,从而为我国著作权的良好有序发展提供法治保障。The protection of copyright criminal law is an important part of the criminal law of China. There are differences between China's Mainland and Hong Kong in the aspects of protection of copyright criminal law, such as the legislative intention, into the crime amount, into the behavior of the crime, the subjective factor, the penalty setting, the penalty conversion, and the connection among the neighboring right, the administrative power and the judicial power. This paper makes a comparison of the protection of copyright criminal law between China's Mainland and Hong Kong, which helps to make up for the protection of copyright criminal law of China, and thus to provide the legal support for the good and orderly development of Chinese copyright.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15